February 20, 2009
I would first like to congratulate Chief Clarence Louie and the rest of the Councilors, Charlotte, Theresa, Tony and Veronica, on being elected last night.
I have high hopes for the new Council because this election process, that was so very heated, started a lot of discussions and caused membership to question a few things, and, left the membership feeling overall that there should at least be some changes made, for our community to improve and grow. This interest should not be ignored because there is a lot of potential that can be drawn from it and this leaves me feeling optimistic and glad. Because, I have said this before and still believe, that it makes no difference where these changes initiate, either from myself or someone else, as long as it means the lives our community members will improve. In the end, I am happy with the whole experience, because I am still the same person that I was when I began the process and did not have to compromise who I am.
Well, I’ll put it this way; my oldest daughter woke me up early this morning jumping and bouncing all over me. She then noticed my drum bag, which was by the side of my bed, grabbed it and pulled out our drums. She grabbed hers right away and passed me mine. Eventually, I woke up enough to join her. And, when we were trying to create a “Cookie Monster” song, I realized that it is through those little brown eyes that I am truly accountable too, because those little eyes will be watching how I act, treat people and conduct myself and it is through those eyes that I will get my toughest evaluation. Because, our children will become who we are and when they grow up they will take on our good qualities, and, unfortunately, our bad, whether we like it or not.
There is still a lot of work to be done, and changes made, that is if our People are able to make some connections. Such as, the drug and alcohol problems that plague our reserve. We cannot address this problem if each term begins with a huge party (last night there was a $2,000 tab at the Mesa). This is sending the wrong message to our Youth, of what the first order of business is. Also, if it was wrong for me to try and submit a letter to the Band newsletter, because Band funds cannot be used for campaign purposes, well, this I can accept. However, why was Clarence allowed to write up a 7 page Question Response, copy it with Band equipment, have a Band employee distribute it, mail it with Band funds to all off-reserve members, ask government officials to comment (on an internal issue) and ask Bank representatives to give a favorable opinion (to one of their clients). If we cannot see that this is unfair, then there will always be factions and splitting up of families in our reserve because some people can do some things while others can’t, that is the very meaning of unfairness.
Going back to the election celebrations, what if someone got injured driving home while intoxicated? Will the community make the connection that maybe there shouldn’t be a drinking celebration? Or, would the community blame the individual for drinking too much? I truly hope nothing does happen, as I have heard there are still some in our community celebrating.
I still believe that Council should be measured by their impact on the community. That means, in 2 years, membership should ask: Has the drugs and alcohol problem gotten better or worse? Have more kids dropped out of high school, or less? How many of our members were sent to jail? How many members get diabetes or other health problems? How many students finished college/university? There is a lot of work to be done yet and some pressing issues, such as rental arrears, inclusion of the community in the Industrial Park development and impact of Sewage Treatment Plant. And, I look forward to the upcoming strategies.
In the end, I am glad that, for myself, I still maintained my integrity, morals and values that I have set for myself and, in the end, if I have to change who I am for a position, really any position, then I don’t want it. And, because I am a traditional person, I will end with a story, this is a story that I first heard while I was in Winnipeg, from a man from Northern Manitoba, and I first told this story at a UBC-O aboriginal grad dinner last Spring:
There was this brilliant man (no, it’s not about me!! hahaha),
He was the most brilliant and smartest person that anyone ever met.
When he got older he decided that since he was so brilliant that he wanted to make the world a better place.
So, he decided that he would go to the United Nations to work.
Because, he figured that it was at the United Nations that he could change the world and solve some of the bigger problems facing the whole world, such as world hunger or peace in the Middle East.
He thought he would start with the big problems.
This was his goal, and because he was so brilliant he figured it was possible.
So, he went to the United Nations and was hired instantly.
He worked hard, year after year.
However, he began to realize that nothing was changing, year after year.
He got more and more discouraged.
Eventually, he got discouraged enough and quit, because things remained the same.
So, he decided that he would start smaller and go back to his Nation and work there.
He figured that if he couldn’t change the world, he should be able to make changes within his Nation.
He applied to work at his Nation and was, again, hired instantly.
He worked hard, year after year.
But, the same thing happened, nothing was changing, and year after year, the same problems remained.
He was discouraged, once again.
Eventually, this caused him to quit his job within his Nation.
By then, he didn’t know what to do and was very confused.
He thought that because he was so brilliant that there should have been some changes made over the years.
So, he came to the conclusion that if there was any place that he could change, he would return to his community and work there.
He figured that it was guaranteed. That it was at the community level is where he could solve problems.
He was sure that those problems could be solved by his brilliant mind.
Again, he was hired instantly from his community.
He worked and worked, very, very hard, year after year.
But, to his surprise, at the community level, the problems still remained.
He was very discouraged, once again.
This brilliant man didn’t know what to do, and thought about it for quite a while.
Then, he realized something.
The only place that he could really change is himself and his own life.
So, he decided to start to change his own life and lived his life in the best way he could.
He did this year after year.
Then, he noticed something.
He noticed the people around him began to change.
There were people that started to see how he was living his life, and this caused them to have a look at their own life.
They thought, if he can do it, so can I!!
And, people started to change how they were living, and more and more people began to see the changes that those people were making.
Eventually, the community began to change for the better …
The End
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Election Results
OIB Election Results:
Chief:
Clarence Louie
Council:
Veronica McGinnis
Theresa Gabriel
Tony Baptiste
Charlotte Stringam
Chief:
Clarence Louie
Council:
Veronica McGinnis
Theresa Gabriel
Tony Baptiste
Charlotte Stringam
Friday, February 20, 2009
What is my plan? What are my solutions??
Many have been asking what my solutions are; if I should become Chief, and they are critical and believe that I am just complaining and not offering enough solutions. In my other writings, I thought that I was offering solutions, but in the end I am here to listen to our People, and if I am not doing my job right or providing something in a clear enough way then I will listen, change, and adjust what I am doing and in this case, take the time here to explain myself a bit better. I am sorry that this may be a bit lengthy to read, but I am an academic and have been trained to speak, read and write. I said the other night “I can talk for hours if given the chance”, well, in terms of writing, “I can write for days!”
Again, I apologize and do not want to burden you with more and more stuff to read. Therefore, I will format this document with headings, that way those of you who choose to read this can skip parts and read only what you feel is important. Here are the subjects I will address:
1. OIBDC Restructuring
2. Referendum Process
3. Meetings and Updates
4. Council Transparency
5. Legal Opposition
6. Trust Funds
7. Band Housing
8. Businesses and Future Developments
9. Youth
I will begin with a quick summary of what I see as the problem, then add my solutions to the problem and make some commitments for change. I am sure that you have been getting “document overload” with all of the things that have been circulating, and I appreciate you taking the time to read what I have. Therefore, I have written this in a way for you to read, walk away, come back and read some more, and walk away again, if you choose.
I will first commit to you that; I will not make personal attacks, degrade anyone, point fingers, belittle, undermine or make personal comments and statements of any kind. That is not how I was taught. I will therefore restrict this discussion to policies, procedures, structures and decisions that I do not agree with.
Also, I was asked by one of our Youth, who understands our Syilx teachings if I “can add a bit more of what those teachings are and how I may apply it to current situations and the importance of practicing those teachings as a leader in the community”. I have heard the request and will try to include some examples. However, it must be stated that what my teachers have shared with me, has become a way of life, which in the end, is hard to communicate specifics because those teachings now guide my life and underlie all my decisions.
Really, I believe that it comes down to what you want, as a Band member. My belief is “It is Time the People had a Voice”. I plan to put in place structures and policies so that you will have that voice. Then, it is up to you if you want to be heard. So, get comfy and put your feet up. Like I said before, I can write for days and you may want to put on some coffee! I have a lot of strategies and ideas that I want to put forward. So, let’s begin.
1. OIBDC Restructuring
Situation: We do not have an overall body that represents the People. Over the past years, OIBDC has restructured and eliminated the OIBDC Board (comprised of Council and advisors) and instead appointed themselves, CEO, CFO, COO and HR as The Team. This is not working in the best interest of the People because there are no checks and balances, accountability within decisions, ways to deal with a conflict of interest, or, input from the people. In effect, you are a corporate shareholder (and a Band member) without a voice. This is not appropriate because if development is supposed to benefit you, as a band members, then it would make sense that you should have input into development decisions. It is not enough that businesses make money and provide some jobs because development should be beneficial to the community as a whole and this means taking into consideration the social, political, cultural and economic factors. So, who better to gauge these factors and long-term community benefits, then you the Band member and shareholder?
Solution: I would like to reinstate the OIBDC Board to include representatives of each OIB family, and one Youth rep and one Elder rep. This will enable business decisions to take into account the long-term effects on the whole community. This is a typical structure of many large corporations (Microsoft, General Motors, etc.) where the Board of Directors is elected by the shareholders (usually at the corporation’s Annual General Assembly). The OIBDC Board, like other corporations, would receive the budget, set the goals, set the yearly direction and the OIBDC executives (CEO, CFO, COO, HR) would run the day-to-day operations. However, those executives would be accountable to the Board, ensuring checks and balances and other structural problems are solved. OIBDC decisions that affect the Band as a whole will be discussed at this table. For instance, if there is another loan that needs to be taken out by OIBDC, which the Band guarantees with Band assets, then the reasoning behind such a decision would be discussed; where the money is intended to go, why it is needed, projected return, and of course, amount of increased risk to the Band and Band members assets. Conflict of interest would be dealt with appropriately because all of the families would be involved and would discuss the matter at hand.
This would mean a greater amount of information sharing and transparency because with a member of each family on the Board, you have someone who can share with you directly what is going on. This is your contact within the whole OIBDC structure. In return, those Board members will bring to the table their families concerns and interests for discussion. The accountability will increase because there will be another layer within the organizational structure that represents the people.
Commitment: I will restructure OIBDC so that there is input from the people. Also, I will ensure that those Board members receive the appropriate training so that they can do their jobs effectively, i.e. understand and read financials. This will ensure that there is Direction from the People.
2. Referendum Process
Situation: The two main problems within the referendum process are; it is too short and there is no opportunity for input. Overall, the referendum process is too short, without adequate time to read and understand all the information, get feedback from the community and have meaningful discussions. Currently the process does follow Indian Affairs guidelines, postings 42 days prior, meetings 14 days prior, etc.
There is no opportunity in the referendum process to provide input because the lease document has already been finalized and gone through legal review. If there are questions and concerns raised at meetings, the document will remain the same, which makes input by community members impossible, you are able to voice your concerns but they will not make it into the document.
Solution: Ultimately, it should be up to the People as to how early in the referendum process lease agreements should be shared and when information should be made available. How long would you like to review documents (45 days, 60 days, etc.)? We have to move beyond just conducting business based on Indian Affairs requirements and decide as a People our own guidelines. I believe, you as a Band member needs to have regular updates on lease negotiations, this includes what is being discussed, what area, which company, how far are the negotiations (just beginning, agreement almost finalized), what’s on the table, etc. This will give you an opportunity to provide OIBDC with input on what you do not support, such as 99-year leases or developments on the waterfront. This will help OIBDC in the negotiations and time will not be wasted because if those negotiators know the membership feels 99-years is too long, then they should negotiate a shorter term from the beginning.
I believe that lease agreements should be circulated as “drafts”, before legal review and final Council approval. If not, then there is really no reason for you to show up to meetings and instead can stay home and read the document (that will not change) and then vote on referendum day. If lease agreements are circulated early, in draft form, it will give you an opportunity to fully understand the agreement before the vote and it will enable changes to be made, if there are clauses or sections that you feel should not be in there.
Commitment: I will provide updates on the lease agreements being negotiated. Also, the updates that OIBDC provides to Council will be made available to those interested. In terms of meetings, there will be at least two per referendum, an initial meeting to discuss the lease agreement in draft form, and another meeting after the document has been finalized and gone through a legal review. The People will determine the appropriate timeline, during future meetings. This will increase the accountability and transparency in the referendum process.
3. Meetings
Situation: There are no meetings and updates provided by the Band or OIBDC. This is unfortunate because it leaves you, in the dark. There is no information about the decisions that are being made or the ability to provide meaningful input, which leads to no accountability. As a Band member and OIBDC corporate shareholder, you deserve to be informed.
Solution: I will have regular updates on Band operations and OIBDC and businesses. This means Band meetings and OIBDC meetings. However, you, the membership, will set most of the agenda. This will mean that those presenting (management, department heads and executives) will provide a quick update and then answer questions that you have requested and want answers to. This will mean that those presenting will not provide a presentation and update on what they are doing right, and leave; they will also answer questions that you have concerns about. The presenters will be given these questions three weeks before each meeting so that they can come prepared. This will increase the accountability and transparency in all operations.
Commitment: I will discuss with membership the meeting schedule and regular meeting times that will be followed throughout the year (ie. Business update after quarterly reports, meetings twice a year on Band operations, etc.). We will begin to have meetings again.
4. Council Transparency
Situation: Band membership does not know how individual Council members feel on issues and concerns facing the Band as a whole. The meeting Minutes and BCR’s are not made readily available. And, when there are Minutes, they do not include names, only general discussions, which is not appropriate for political positions. You, as a band member, should be able to track which Council member said what, who agreed with which decision, who disagreed, what was discussed and by whom, etc. This will enable you to vote according to how you feel each Council member, over the past two years, represented what you feel is the right direction for our community. Currently, there is no way to track any political position.
Solution: Minutes and BCR’s will be readily available to all members, through secure websites and housed in an area that no one feels intimidated to enter and browse. Names will be added to comments within the Minutes. Also, in terms of meetings I will require presentations from each Council member on the issue being discussed. If it is a referendum, then each Council member will provide an explanation of what they like and dislike (at least one of each) about the choice, and where they stand and why they choose to agree or disagree. This will allow you to fully understand what was taken into consideration during Council discussions and who supports and doesn’t support the referendum, and why. Further, it will mean that Council members will have to keep up-to-date on everything that is going on. Also, lawyers, consultants and only a few Council members should not be the only ones speaking on issues; the whole Council should be involved. This will increase the accountability and democracy.
Commitment: All of Council will provide presentations to the membership about the meeting issue or decision. Minutes, with Council comments, will be provided to the community and made readily available.
5. Legal Opposition
Situation: As someone on the opposite side, calling for input from the People on Band operations, I have always felt when I voiced my opinions, and when I stated my opposition publicly I was met with personal attacks, singled out, my opinion belittled, snide remarks, undermining of who I am personally, called a liar, and the overall situation is made out to be based on who I am personally and the issue, concern and question is never really dealt with effectively. I am left feeling attacked and my questions still unanswered. It is no wonder no one wants to publicly oppose. But, I continue to speak for those who have problems, are treated unfairly or unjustly, and want to remain anonymous because, that is what a leader does, speak for those who cannot or are unwilling to speak for themselves. However, I believe that all governments should have an opposition; because this enables greater accountability, fairness and equality in viewpoints.
Solution: I cannot do anything about those who continually treat others with no respect and it is unfortunate that this has become acceptable behavior in our community; I have been taught by my teachers that you can not change the behavior of anyone, all you can do is lead by example and show the People another way.
So, I will set up a “legal” opposition party that will get information on request, analyze it and provide their interpretation, however they see fit. This opposition party will be provided with the opportunity and time at Band meetings to provide their position on what is happening. However, they will be called to provide at least one positive viewpoint. I do not like being attacked when I provide an oppositional viewpoint and will not turn around and do that to someone else, and will treat everyone with respect, once I am in a position of power. I am told by my teachers that we need that oppositional viewpoint because that voice will often bring to the discussion what no one else has provided. Also, I am told by my teachers that you do not turn to those you like to ask how you are doing, so that they can in turn pat you on the back, and tell you that you are doing a great job, you ask those that don’t like you because they will give it to you straight and this will enable you to grow as an individual and a leader.
Commitment: I have always said that I do not want to substitute one faction in the community for another because that will not benefit the Band as a whole. If we are to move forward, I believe that we should move forward together. Therefore, I will keep this “legal” opposition in place until the community feels the need to not attend such meetings. This will only come when there are enough venues, places and opportunities for everyone to voice their opinions and do not need to have “legal” opposition meetings, because everything will have been said through other means. And, those that provide that voice, I will not make personal attacks, single out, belittled, make snide remarks, undermining on a personal level, call a liar and make the overall situation a personal issue. I will welcome that other viewpoint and allow that voice to speak without retribution and fear, and you will be allowed to speak your mind.
6. Trust Funds:
Situation: There is money being put aside for our children and no one knows where, how much is being made (or lost), why we do not receive updates, who is responsible for it and how much our children will get when they turn a certain age. Recently, one of our Youth was expecting an amount that their sibling got one year earlier, but when that youth went to get their money, they received $8,000 LESS.
Solution: We all should be provided with (at the least) yearly updates on where our children’s money is, what it is gaining (loosing), who is looking after it, why it is in certain portfolio’s, what risks are involved, etc.
Commitment: People have been asking long enough and I will make this information available and will provide (at the least) yearly updates on what is happening with our children’s Trust Fund monies.
7. Band Housing
Situation: There is a current rental arrears crisis within the Band, and that means if it continues then the Band will loose it’s social housing allotments. This is known, and I believe the problems starts with the selection of those who receive a house.
Solution: I believe that there should be a point system, which will ensure that the selection is open, transparent and objective. This will mean that a point system will be developed to include the criteria involved in housing selection, such as number of kids, employment history, credit history, etc.
Those of you who apply will know the criteria, and everyone will know who else is on the list. That way, when the housing committee selection is about to happen, then you will already knows where you sit, based on the point system and the others on the list. There should be no surprises and those of you who know you won’t get a house this year, can position themselves on the list, as 7 or 12, and if there are 5 houses a year, then you will know that if you won’t get one this year, you will be second on the list next year (if you are 7th).
In terms of the Housing Committee, everyone should know which individuals are actually on the Committee. Also, after the Housing Committee selection meeting has taken place, then the meeting Minutes should be handed out to those of you who are on the list. This will greatly increase the transparency and accountability of the Housing selection process and make it fair and equitable.
Commitment: I will make the Housing selection process as transparent and accountable, and fair and equitable as structurally possible.
8. Businesses and Developments
Situation: There are still individuals that tell me how they have been mistreated unfairly within job positions and there are those that make less than other non-native employees or make less than what their positions will pay off-reserve. And, those that have been given a higher starting wage because of their family or whom they support. Also, we currently have no employment strategies in place that are there to help our people get into management positions and many of the Businesses have very few band members working on staff.
Solution: I believe that if we are going to reduce the unemployment on our reserve, then we have to involve those of you that are currently unemployed, under employed and our youth. This would involve a few programs, such as; a job shadowing program for youth, management track positions for students and others interested, employment targets for our Businesses on reserve, education and training strategies, etc. Also, those of you that are unemployed, under employed, youth and students should be given the opportunity to provide input into the developments on our lands because it will always be you, who will be called upon to fill such positions when they arise.
In terms of pay equity, there should be no inequality, and, I have no problem providing our people with equal wages. If you feel that you are being treated unfairly or unequally and want a pay increase, then you will be allowed to state your case. However, that decision to increase wages will be done openly and transparently, so it will be based on fairness and equality, not which family you are from or whom you support. The decision will be made openly and known by all, to increase accountability and fairness, that way the Membership will know that if you receive a wage increase, that it is not because you are from a certain family or support a certain person, the Membership will understand the decision was based on fairness and equality. In the end, we need to put money back into the hands of the people.
Commitment: I will take a proactive approach to development and involve those of you that are unemployed, under employed, youth and students. Those that feel they have been treated fairly will have an opportunity to state their case.
9. Youth
Situation: We have an excellent Youth Center that has recently opened. Unfortunately, I have already heard stories of some of our Youth damaging and disrespecting things in the Center, the pool table, cues, furniture, etc. Some people have already stated “Well, that is what is going to happen” and I believe that is wrong, and that it shouldn’t happen and it is the responsibility of leaders to ensure that it doesn’t.
Solution: As leaders, we need to provide mentorship, leadership and above all set examples for our Youth. Raising funds, borrowing money, drafting the blueprints and building the Center is the easy part. The hard part is the long-term effects, allowing the Center to change the lives of some of our Youth in a positive way. I don’t think the celebration should be at the Center opening, I believe the celebration should come after one year, when our Youth can speak for themselves about how the Center has changed their lives. This means, there better be someone there after a year, or we aren’t doing our jobs right. Leadership should be directly involved for the long term, through programs such as a young warriors group, girl-power program or other means; if we are serious about change, then that means putting in the time commitment.
I will require the Youth involved in the Center to organize themselves, they will form a group, pick their leaders, hold discussion and become leaders in their own way. Structurally, they will be put in leadership positions and be given the opportunity to select one amongst them to sit on the OIBDC Board of Directors. Also, they will be provided with all the information they request and given the opportunity and time to speak at Band meetings to address how the issue being discussed affects them, as Youth. Also, they will be given the opportunity to develop their own programs and activities and the responsibility to ensure its success.
Commitment: I will put in the time to help our young leaders of tomorrow. Also, if elected, I will hold an anniversary celebration where our Youth will be given the opportunity to present how the Center has changed their lives.
Final Words
I would like to first thank you for taking the time out of your busy life to read what I have to say.
Our elders, during every ceremony I have attended, begin with “I am not trying to be anyone, I am just here to present what I have been taught” and that’s what I believe because I have been taught that a Chief is the Voice of the People, not someone who makes decisions on behalf of, and for the People. I do not say that I am better than anyone else, that you should pick me because I am smarter, or wiser, or can run faster, etc., I say choose me because you want to have input, you want to know what is going on and you have something to say. Even the management courses I have taken believe that “the mark of a true leader in an organization, will not be present, they will be unknown and in the background because those are the leaders who empower everyone around them to become leaders themselves”.
I have been taught by my teachers that: “In order to make a decision that will truly benefit your community, you have to involve everyone, especially those that are against you and are in the minority: Because, then you, as a community, will know that everything will have been taken into consideration and the decision reached will be better for it”.
I was asked once: “Do you know that people might be using you, that they come to you with a problem and ask you to help them, because they know you will say something. Then when it is over, they walk away and don’t support you and you are branded a trouble-maker, again?”
My response to that question: “Yes, I know there are those who I have helped in the past many years that will not vote for me, now, or in the future. But that is what a leader does. I will speak for those who are afraid and unwilling to speak for themselves. And, ask nothing in return because that is how I have been taught”.
In the end, I would not run:
• If no one called me to ask me to speak for him or her because they have been treated unfairly or unjustly and are unwilling to speak for themselves.
• If I knew the People were involved fully in the decision making process.
• If the oppositional viewpoints were allowed and could be stated with no recourse, repercussions or fear.
• If developments were done with the People, and not for the People, on their behalf.
• If there were transparency and accountability within Band operations.
• If everyone were treated fairly and equally, etc, etc.
Like I said before, I really do believe that it comes down to what you want, as a Band member. My belief is still “It is Time the People had a Voice”. I have shared with you a plan and will put in place structures and policies so that you will have that Voice. Then, it is up to you if you want to be heard. This is not an “election promise” because it is based on the traditional teachings that I have been privileged enough to hear from our elders. These teachings guide who I am, in my life, education, careers, as a father, etc., and I will be the same after Feb 19, in 2 years, in 10 years … because I am who I am and this will not change because of a Title. Thank you again for your time.
Again, I apologize and do not want to burden you with more and more stuff to read. Therefore, I will format this document with headings, that way those of you who choose to read this can skip parts and read only what you feel is important. Here are the subjects I will address:
1. OIBDC Restructuring
2. Referendum Process
3. Meetings and Updates
4. Council Transparency
5. Legal Opposition
6. Trust Funds
7. Band Housing
8. Businesses and Future Developments
9. Youth
I will begin with a quick summary of what I see as the problem, then add my solutions to the problem and make some commitments for change. I am sure that you have been getting “document overload” with all of the things that have been circulating, and I appreciate you taking the time to read what I have. Therefore, I have written this in a way for you to read, walk away, come back and read some more, and walk away again, if you choose.
I will first commit to you that; I will not make personal attacks, degrade anyone, point fingers, belittle, undermine or make personal comments and statements of any kind. That is not how I was taught. I will therefore restrict this discussion to policies, procedures, structures and decisions that I do not agree with.
Also, I was asked by one of our Youth, who understands our Syilx teachings if I “can add a bit more of what those teachings are and how I may apply it to current situations and the importance of practicing those teachings as a leader in the community”. I have heard the request and will try to include some examples. However, it must be stated that what my teachers have shared with me, has become a way of life, which in the end, is hard to communicate specifics because those teachings now guide my life and underlie all my decisions.
Really, I believe that it comes down to what you want, as a Band member. My belief is “It is Time the People had a Voice”. I plan to put in place structures and policies so that you will have that voice. Then, it is up to you if you want to be heard. So, get comfy and put your feet up. Like I said before, I can write for days and you may want to put on some coffee! I have a lot of strategies and ideas that I want to put forward. So, let’s begin.
1. OIBDC Restructuring
Situation: We do not have an overall body that represents the People. Over the past years, OIBDC has restructured and eliminated the OIBDC Board (comprised of Council and advisors) and instead appointed themselves, CEO, CFO, COO and HR as The Team. This is not working in the best interest of the People because there are no checks and balances, accountability within decisions, ways to deal with a conflict of interest, or, input from the people. In effect, you are a corporate shareholder (and a Band member) without a voice. This is not appropriate because if development is supposed to benefit you, as a band members, then it would make sense that you should have input into development decisions. It is not enough that businesses make money and provide some jobs because development should be beneficial to the community as a whole and this means taking into consideration the social, political, cultural and economic factors. So, who better to gauge these factors and long-term community benefits, then you the Band member and shareholder?
Solution: I would like to reinstate the OIBDC Board to include representatives of each OIB family, and one Youth rep and one Elder rep. This will enable business decisions to take into account the long-term effects on the whole community. This is a typical structure of many large corporations (Microsoft, General Motors, etc.) where the Board of Directors is elected by the shareholders (usually at the corporation’s Annual General Assembly). The OIBDC Board, like other corporations, would receive the budget, set the goals, set the yearly direction and the OIBDC executives (CEO, CFO, COO, HR) would run the day-to-day operations. However, those executives would be accountable to the Board, ensuring checks and balances and other structural problems are solved. OIBDC decisions that affect the Band as a whole will be discussed at this table. For instance, if there is another loan that needs to be taken out by OIBDC, which the Band guarantees with Band assets, then the reasoning behind such a decision would be discussed; where the money is intended to go, why it is needed, projected return, and of course, amount of increased risk to the Band and Band members assets. Conflict of interest would be dealt with appropriately because all of the families would be involved and would discuss the matter at hand.
This would mean a greater amount of information sharing and transparency because with a member of each family on the Board, you have someone who can share with you directly what is going on. This is your contact within the whole OIBDC structure. In return, those Board members will bring to the table their families concerns and interests for discussion. The accountability will increase because there will be another layer within the organizational structure that represents the people.
Commitment: I will restructure OIBDC so that there is input from the people. Also, I will ensure that those Board members receive the appropriate training so that they can do their jobs effectively, i.e. understand and read financials. This will ensure that there is Direction from the People.
2. Referendum Process
Situation: The two main problems within the referendum process are; it is too short and there is no opportunity for input. Overall, the referendum process is too short, without adequate time to read and understand all the information, get feedback from the community and have meaningful discussions. Currently the process does follow Indian Affairs guidelines, postings 42 days prior, meetings 14 days prior, etc.
There is no opportunity in the referendum process to provide input because the lease document has already been finalized and gone through legal review. If there are questions and concerns raised at meetings, the document will remain the same, which makes input by community members impossible, you are able to voice your concerns but they will not make it into the document.
Solution: Ultimately, it should be up to the People as to how early in the referendum process lease agreements should be shared and when information should be made available. How long would you like to review documents (45 days, 60 days, etc.)? We have to move beyond just conducting business based on Indian Affairs requirements and decide as a People our own guidelines. I believe, you as a Band member needs to have regular updates on lease negotiations, this includes what is being discussed, what area, which company, how far are the negotiations (just beginning, agreement almost finalized), what’s on the table, etc. This will give you an opportunity to provide OIBDC with input on what you do not support, such as 99-year leases or developments on the waterfront. This will help OIBDC in the negotiations and time will not be wasted because if those negotiators know the membership feels 99-years is too long, then they should negotiate a shorter term from the beginning.
I believe that lease agreements should be circulated as “drafts”, before legal review and final Council approval. If not, then there is really no reason for you to show up to meetings and instead can stay home and read the document (that will not change) and then vote on referendum day. If lease agreements are circulated early, in draft form, it will give you an opportunity to fully understand the agreement before the vote and it will enable changes to be made, if there are clauses or sections that you feel should not be in there.
Commitment: I will provide updates on the lease agreements being negotiated. Also, the updates that OIBDC provides to Council will be made available to those interested. In terms of meetings, there will be at least two per referendum, an initial meeting to discuss the lease agreement in draft form, and another meeting after the document has been finalized and gone through a legal review. The People will determine the appropriate timeline, during future meetings. This will increase the accountability and transparency in the referendum process.
3. Meetings
Situation: There are no meetings and updates provided by the Band or OIBDC. This is unfortunate because it leaves you, in the dark. There is no information about the decisions that are being made or the ability to provide meaningful input, which leads to no accountability. As a Band member and OIBDC corporate shareholder, you deserve to be informed.
Solution: I will have regular updates on Band operations and OIBDC and businesses. This means Band meetings and OIBDC meetings. However, you, the membership, will set most of the agenda. This will mean that those presenting (management, department heads and executives) will provide a quick update and then answer questions that you have requested and want answers to. This will mean that those presenting will not provide a presentation and update on what they are doing right, and leave; they will also answer questions that you have concerns about. The presenters will be given these questions three weeks before each meeting so that they can come prepared. This will increase the accountability and transparency in all operations.
Commitment: I will discuss with membership the meeting schedule and regular meeting times that will be followed throughout the year (ie. Business update after quarterly reports, meetings twice a year on Band operations, etc.). We will begin to have meetings again.
4. Council Transparency
Situation: Band membership does not know how individual Council members feel on issues and concerns facing the Band as a whole. The meeting Minutes and BCR’s are not made readily available. And, when there are Minutes, they do not include names, only general discussions, which is not appropriate for political positions. You, as a band member, should be able to track which Council member said what, who agreed with which decision, who disagreed, what was discussed and by whom, etc. This will enable you to vote according to how you feel each Council member, over the past two years, represented what you feel is the right direction for our community. Currently, there is no way to track any political position.
Solution: Minutes and BCR’s will be readily available to all members, through secure websites and housed in an area that no one feels intimidated to enter and browse. Names will be added to comments within the Minutes. Also, in terms of meetings I will require presentations from each Council member on the issue being discussed. If it is a referendum, then each Council member will provide an explanation of what they like and dislike (at least one of each) about the choice, and where they stand and why they choose to agree or disagree. This will allow you to fully understand what was taken into consideration during Council discussions and who supports and doesn’t support the referendum, and why. Further, it will mean that Council members will have to keep up-to-date on everything that is going on. Also, lawyers, consultants and only a few Council members should not be the only ones speaking on issues; the whole Council should be involved. This will increase the accountability and democracy.
Commitment: All of Council will provide presentations to the membership about the meeting issue or decision. Minutes, with Council comments, will be provided to the community and made readily available.
5. Legal Opposition
Situation: As someone on the opposite side, calling for input from the People on Band operations, I have always felt when I voiced my opinions, and when I stated my opposition publicly I was met with personal attacks, singled out, my opinion belittled, snide remarks, undermining of who I am personally, called a liar, and the overall situation is made out to be based on who I am personally and the issue, concern and question is never really dealt with effectively. I am left feeling attacked and my questions still unanswered. It is no wonder no one wants to publicly oppose. But, I continue to speak for those who have problems, are treated unfairly or unjustly, and want to remain anonymous because, that is what a leader does, speak for those who cannot or are unwilling to speak for themselves. However, I believe that all governments should have an opposition; because this enables greater accountability, fairness and equality in viewpoints.
Solution: I cannot do anything about those who continually treat others with no respect and it is unfortunate that this has become acceptable behavior in our community; I have been taught by my teachers that you can not change the behavior of anyone, all you can do is lead by example and show the People another way.
So, I will set up a “legal” opposition party that will get information on request, analyze it and provide their interpretation, however they see fit. This opposition party will be provided with the opportunity and time at Band meetings to provide their position on what is happening. However, they will be called to provide at least one positive viewpoint. I do not like being attacked when I provide an oppositional viewpoint and will not turn around and do that to someone else, and will treat everyone with respect, once I am in a position of power. I am told by my teachers that we need that oppositional viewpoint because that voice will often bring to the discussion what no one else has provided. Also, I am told by my teachers that you do not turn to those you like to ask how you are doing, so that they can in turn pat you on the back, and tell you that you are doing a great job, you ask those that don’t like you because they will give it to you straight and this will enable you to grow as an individual and a leader.
Commitment: I have always said that I do not want to substitute one faction in the community for another because that will not benefit the Band as a whole. If we are to move forward, I believe that we should move forward together. Therefore, I will keep this “legal” opposition in place until the community feels the need to not attend such meetings. This will only come when there are enough venues, places and opportunities for everyone to voice their opinions and do not need to have “legal” opposition meetings, because everything will have been said through other means. And, those that provide that voice, I will not make personal attacks, single out, belittled, make snide remarks, undermining on a personal level, call a liar and make the overall situation a personal issue. I will welcome that other viewpoint and allow that voice to speak without retribution and fear, and you will be allowed to speak your mind.
6. Trust Funds:
Situation: There is money being put aside for our children and no one knows where, how much is being made (or lost), why we do not receive updates, who is responsible for it and how much our children will get when they turn a certain age. Recently, one of our Youth was expecting an amount that their sibling got one year earlier, but when that youth went to get their money, they received $8,000 LESS.
Solution: We all should be provided with (at the least) yearly updates on where our children’s money is, what it is gaining (loosing), who is looking after it, why it is in certain portfolio’s, what risks are involved, etc.
Commitment: People have been asking long enough and I will make this information available and will provide (at the least) yearly updates on what is happening with our children’s Trust Fund monies.
7. Band Housing
Situation: There is a current rental arrears crisis within the Band, and that means if it continues then the Band will loose it’s social housing allotments. This is known, and I believe the problems starts with the selection of those who receive a house.
Solution: I believe that there should be a point system, which will ensure that the selection is open, transparent and objective. This will mean that a point system will be developed to include the criteria involved in housing selection, such as number of kids, employment history, credit history, etc.
Those of you who apply will know the criteria, and everyone will know who else is on the list. That way, when the housing committee selection is about to happen, then you will already knows where you sit, based on the point system and the others on the list. There should be no surprises and those of you who know you won’t get a house this year, can position themselves on the list, as 7 or 12, and if there are 5 houses a year, then you will know that if you won’t get one this year, you will be second on the list next year (if you are 7th).
In terms of the Housing Committee, everyone should know which individuals are actually on the Committee. Also, after the Housing Committee selection meeting has taken place, then the meeting Minutes should be handed out to those of you who are on the list. This will greatly increase the transparency and accountability of the Housing selection process and make it fair and equitable.
Commitment: I will make the Housing selection process as transparent and accountable, and fair and equitable as structurally possible.
8. Businesses and Developments
Situation: There are still individuals that tell me how they have been mistreated unfairly within job positions and there are those that make less than other non-native employees or make less than what their positions will pay off-reserve. And, those that have been given a higher starting wage because of their family or whom they support. Also, we currently have no employment strategies in place that are there to help our people get into management positions and many of the Businesses have very few band members working on staff.
Solution: I believe that if we are going to reduce the unemployment on our reserve, then we have to involve those of you that are currently unemployed, under employed and our youth. This would involve a few programs, such as; a job shadowing program for youth, management track positions for students and others interested, employment targets for our Businesses on reserve, education and training strategies, etc. Also, those of you that are unemployed, under employed, youth and students should be given the opportunity to provide input into the developments on our lands because it will always be you, who will be called upon to fill such positions when they arise.
In terms of pay equity, there should be no inequality, and, I have no problem providing our people with equal wages. If you feel that you are being treated unfairly or unequally and want a pay increase, then you will be allowed to state your case. However, that decision to increase wages will be done openly and transparently, so it will be based on fairness and equality, not which family you are from or whom you support. The decision will be made openly and known by all, to increase accountability and fairness, that way the Membership will know that if you receive a wage increase, that it is not because you are from a certain family or support a certain person, the Membership will understand the decision was based on fairness and equality. In the end, we need to put money back into the hands of the people.
Commitment: I will take a proactive approach to development and involve those of you that are unemployed, under employed, youth and students. Those that feel they have been treated fairly will have an opportunity to state their case.
9. Youth
Situation: We have an excellent Youth Center that has recently opened. Unfortunately, I have already heard stories of some of our Youth damaging and disrespecting things in the Center, the pool table, cues, furniture, etc. Some people have already stated “Well, that is what is going to happen” and I believe that is wrong, and that it shouldn’t happen and it is the responsibility of leaders to ensure that it doesn’t.
Solution: As leaders, we need to provide mentorship, leadership and above all set examples for our Youth. Raising funds, borrowing money, drafting the blueprints and building the Center is the easy part. The hard part is the long-term effects, allowing the Center to change the lives of some of our Youth in a positive way. I don’t think the celebration should be at the Center opening, I believe the celebration should come after one year, when our Youth can speak for themselves about how the Center has changed their lives. This means, there better be someone there after a year, or we aren’t doing our jobs right. Leadership should be directly involved for the long term, through programs such as a young warriors group, girl-power program or other means; if we are serious about change, then that means putting in the time commitment.
I will require the Youth involved in the Center to organize themselves, they will form a group, pick their leaders, hold discussion and become leaders in their own way. Structurally, they will be put in leadership positions and be given the opportunity to select one amongst them to sit on the OIBDC Board of Directors. Also, they will be provided with all the information they request and given the opportunity and time to speak at Band meetings to address how the issue being discussed affects them, as Youth. Also, they will be given the opportunity to develop their own programs and activities and the responsibility to ensure its success.
Commitment: I will put in the time to help our young leaders of tomorrow. Also, if elected, I will hold an anniversary celebration where our Youth will be given the opportunity to present how the Center has changed their lives.
Final Words
I would like to first thank you for taking the time out of your busy life to read what I have to say.
Our elders, during every ceremony I have attended, begin with “I am not trying to be anyone, I am just here to present what I have been taught” and that’s what I believe because I have been taught that a Chief is the Voice of the People, not someone who makes decisions on behalf of, and for the People. I do not say that I am better than anyone else, that you should pick me because I am smarter, or wiser, or can run faster, etc., I say choose me because you want to have input, you want to know what is going on and you have something to say. Even the management courses I have taken believe that “the mark of a true leader in an organization, will not be present, they will be unknown and in the background because those are the leaders who empower everyone around them to become leaders themselves”.
I have been taught by my teachers that: “In order to make a decision that will truly benefit your community, you have to involve everyone, especially those that are against you and are in the minority: Because, then you, as a community, will know that everything will have been taken into consideration and the decision reached will be better for it”.
I was asked once: “Do you know that people might be using you, that they come to you with a problem and ask you to help them, because they know you will say something. Then when it is over, they walk away and don’t support you and you are branded a trouble-maker, again?”
My response to that question: “Yes, I know there are those who I have helped in the past many years that will not vote for me, now, or in the future. But that is what a leader does. I will speak for those who are afraid and unwilling to speak for themselves. And, ask nothing in return because that is how I have been taught”.
In the end, I would not run:
• If no one called me to ask me to speak for him or her because they have been treated unfairly or unjustly and are unwilling to speak for themselves.
• If I knew the People were involved fully in the decision making process.
• If the oppositional viewpoints were allowed and could be stated with no recourse, repercussions or fear.
• If developments were done with the People, and not for the People, on their behalf.
• If there were transparency and accountability within Band operations.
• If everyone were treated fairly and equally, etc, etc.
Like I said before, I really do believe that it comes down to what you want, as a Band member. My belief is still “It is Time the People had a Voice”. I have shared with you a plan and will put in place structures and policies so that you will have that Voice. Then, it is up to you if you want to be heard. This is not an “election promise” because it is based on the traditional teachings that I have been privileged enough to hear from our elders. These teachings guide who I am, in my life, education, careers, as a father, etc., and I will be the same after Feb 19, in 2 years, in 10 years … because I am who I am and this will not change because of a Title. Thank you again for your time.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Member Question: Will you fire everyone at the Vineyard, including the Managment?
My response:
No, once again ... I will not fire anyone if I am elected.
There seems to be a trend here and, I will address it by sharing what I believe a Chief position is and how I will approach these types of issues, related to my platform.
If I am calling for Accountability and Transparency, and truly I believe that, if I should get elected, that I have to uphold those principles and continue to be mindful of the very criticism we currently see in our community. Personally, I don't believe that a Chief has the power to fire who they want to. This opinion will not change if elected because my view of leadership has been shaped by my own graduate research into our (Syilx) stories, language, songs, ceremonies, etc. Those are the principles and values that guide who I am and they will not change based on political positions.
So, what is the Solution? I believe every community needs is a split from the Business Operations and Political Operations, without it, both sides suffer. Either the Political overtakes and meddles in the Business side, too greatly to cause overall profitability to suffer. Or, the Business side makes all the decisions based on profits and financial viability, not taking into considering the long term effects of the people and community and really, no one is there to speak for the people, the people aren't included in decision making and there is a top-down approach to overall Band decisions (similar to a Corporation).
This split that I am proposing is based on a split between the day-to-day operations of the Band Business side and Political side, so that politics doesn't play into the operations, such as hiring or firing, where only people who support a certain leader or those from certain families are hired and fired. I believe in Equality and Fairness, and that means everyone should have an equal chance to be hired, all job positions should be posted and there should be employment equity in wages and salaries.
Overall, I believe that everyone should be regularly informed of the Band operations, so that membership is given adequate time to provide input (in the beginning not after a lease agreement has been finalized), are able to review and understand all documents and will be empowered to make well-informed decisions based on what they want to see in their community. That is the job of the Political side, what I am committed to provide to our community if elected and the basis for what I see as need for Direction From the People.
In terms of political power, If I am elected, I believe a Chief's powers are not that broad and far reaching, that I can not make decisions on my own or will be the final word. In terms of the Chief and Council decision making process, I understand that a Chief doesn't even vote unless there is a need to break a tie. So, in terms of big decisions, such as the hiring and firing of a manager, well, those have to be conducted with strict Transparency, so that everyone is aware of the situation and how Council has reached a decision, openly. Overall, increasing the Accountability of Council, because I believe membership should be aware of the Council discussions, what was included within the discussion and, most importantly, who took what position. This will lead to basic good governance operations because then it will allow membership to vote in the future, based on which Council member represented what they feel is important in the community, and which one's didn't.
No, once again ... I will not fire anyone if I am elected.
There seems to be a trend here and, I will address it by sharing what I believe a Chief position is and how I will approach these types of issues, related to my platform.
If I am calling for Accountability and Transparency, and truly I believe that, if I should get elected, that I have to uphold those principles and continue to be mindful of the very criticism we currently see in our community. Personally, I don't believe that a Chief has the power to fire who they want to. This opinion will not change if elected because my view of leadership has been shaped by my own graduate research into our (Syilx) stories, language, songs, ceremonies, etc. Those are the principles and values that guide who I am and they will not change based on political positions.
So, what is the Solution? I believe every community needs is a split from the Business Operations and Political Operations, without it, both sides suffer. Either the Political overtakes and meddles in the Business side, too greatly to cause overall profitability to suffer. Or, the Business side makes all the decisions based on profits and financial viability, not taking into considering the long term effects of the people and community and really, no one is there to speak for the people, the people aren't included in decision making and there is a top-down approach to overall Band decisions (similar to a Corporation).
This split that I am proposing is based on a split between the day-to-day operations of the Band Business side and Political side, so that politics doesn't play into the operations, such as hiring or firing, where only people who support a certain leader or those from certain families are hired and fired. I believe in Equality and Fairness, and that means everyone should have an equal chance to be hired, all job positions should be posted and there should be employment equity in wages and salaries.
Overall, I believe that everyone should be regularly informed of the Band operations, so that membership is given adequate time to provide input (in the beginning not after a lease agreement has been finalized), are able to review and understand all documents and will be empowered to make well-informed decisions based on what they want to see in their community. That is the job of the Political side, what I am committed to provide to our community if elected and the basis for what I see as need for Direction From the People.
In terms of political power, If I am elected, I believe a Chief's powers are not that broad and far reaching, that I can not make decisions on my own or will be the final word. In terms of the Chief and Council decision making process, I understand that a Chief doesn't even vote unless there is a need to break a tie. So, in terms of big decisions, such as the hiring and firing of a manager, well, those have to be conducted with strict Transparency, so that everyone is aware of the situation and how Council has reached a decision, openly. Overall, increasing the Accountability of Council, because I believe membership should be aware of the Council discussions, what was included within the discussion and, most importantly, who took what position. This will lead to basic good governance operations because then it will allow membership to vote in the future, based on which Council member represented what they feel is important in the community, and which one's didn't.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Members Concern: If you become Chief, will I lose my job?
My Response:
No, you will not lose your job.
Similarly to the Will the Band go Broke question:
"On the business end, everything will be the same, as businesses that are in place now will still be in existence, after a future transition in the Chief's office. The day-to-day operation structure will remain the same, as the CEO, management and employment positions will not change."
After a transition in leadership, the Band will still need people to; run all the Band programs (social assistance, health, drug and alcohol, education, etc), work in all the Band businesses (sell pop and chips, provide tours, make houses), work in the Band office (cut the grass, answer phones, record presentations), etc.
On the employment end, things will remain the same.
No, you will not lose your job.
Similarly to the Will the Band go Broke question:
"On the business end, everything will be the same, as businesses that are in place now will still be in existence, after a future transition in the Chief's office. The day-to-day operation structure will remain the same, as the CEO, management and employment positions will not change."
After a transition in leadership, the Band will still need people to; run all the Band programs (social assistance, health, drug and alcohol, education, etc), work in all the Band businesses (sell pop and chips, provide tours, make houses), work in the Band office (cut the grass, answer phones, record presentations), etc.
On the employment end, things will remain the same.
Members Concern: If you become Chief, will the Band go broke?
My Response:
No, the Osoyoos Indian Band or Osoyoos Indian Band Development Corporation will not go broke.
On the business end, everything will be the same, as businesses that are in place now will still be in existence, after a future transition in the Chief's office. The day-to-day operation structure will remain the same, as the CEO, management and employment positions will not change. However, what will happen is more transparency and accountability within the existing businesses and future business decisions.
I believe that OIBDC needs a refocusing of development goals, not goals that are based on making jobs and money but goals that are driven from the community members. Even the simple goals of jobs and money can be problematic. For example, how much money is needed for a certain area to be developed, what is it worth to the community, why are trying to sell the land for 99 years, etc.? Also, what types of jobs do community members want, how many are needed, do members want meaningful employment or any job and any wage, what do members see as meaningful, etc.? We don't know until we ask the community members. It is the community members that are supposed to benefit from OIB development in the first place, so, shouldn't it be the community members that are involved in the decisions that are made and what goals are set? Currently, those decisions are only being made by a handful of people.
We need more transparency within business operations. That means, at the very least, band meetings on all of the OIB businesses where managers can provide updates on how a particular business has been performing and what has happened over the year (or, 6 months). We also need accountability. This does not mean sharing of financial statements, because those are nice to see, but if there is no ability or mechanism for community members to provide feedback, then it is not adequate. Accountability involves two-way communication. Why do we keep borrowing more and more money, and falling further and further into debt? If a business isn't making as much money as projected, then why? Saying is it is due to the economic downturn of the Canadian economy isn't good enough, the membership should be provided with specifics.
These are some of the reasons why I am calling for Transparency and Accountability in all Band operations and businesses.
No, the Osoyoos Indian Band or Osoyoos Indian Band Development Corporation will not go broke.
On the business end, everything will be the same, as businesses that are in place now will still be in existence, after a future transition in the Chief's office. The day-to-day operation structure will remain the same, as the CEO, management and employment positions will not change. However, what will happen is more transparency and accountability within the existing businesses and future business decisions.
I believe that OIBDC needs a refocusing of development goals, not goals that are based on making jobs and money but goals that are driven from the community members. Even the simple goals of jobs and money can be problematic. For example, how much money is needed for a certain area to be developed, what is it worth to the community, why are trying to sell the land for 99 years, etc.? Also, what types of jobs do community members want, how many are needed, do members want meaningful employment or any job and any wage, what do members see as meaningful, etc.? We don't know until we ask the community members. It is the community members that are supposed to benefit from OIB development in the first place, so, shouldn't it be the community members that are involved in the decisions that are made and what goals are set? Currently, those decisions are only being made by a handful of people.
We need more transparency within business operations. That means, at the very least, band meetings on all of the OIB businesses where managers can provide updates on how a particular business has been performing and what has happened over the year (or, 6 months). We also need accountability. This does not mean sharing of financial statements, because those are nice to see, but if there is no ability or mechanism for community members to provide feedback, then it is not adequate. Accountability involves two-way communication. Why do we keep borrowing more and more money, and falling further and further into debt? If a business isn't making as much money as projected, then why? Saying is it is due to the economic downturn of the Canadian economy isn't good enough, the membership should be provided with specifics.
These are some of the reasons why I am calling for Transparency and Accountability in all Band operations and businesses.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
OIB Nominations Results
Jan 6, 2009
Nomination Meeting at OIB Hall - Results:
Nominated for Chief:
1. Clarence Louie Nominated by Modesta Betterton, Celina Alex
2. Ethan Baptiste Nom. by Kenneth Bryson, Theresa Gabriel
Nominated for Councillor:
1. Charlotte Stringam Nom. by Leona Baptiste, Aleana Baptiste
2. Kathy Falkus, Nom. by Linda Anderson, Modesta Betterton
3. Anthony (Tony) Baptiste, Nom. by Modesta Betterton, Deborah Baptiste (Bouclair)
4. Helen Gallagher, Nom. by Leona Baptiste, Anthony (Tony) Baptiste
5. Charlene Baptiste, Nom. by Deborah Baptiste (Bouclair), Georgina Wright
6. Hubert George, Nom. by Ethan Baptiste, Moses Baptiste
7. Veronica McGinnis, Nom. by Ethan Baptiste, Cecilia George
8. Theresa Gabriel, Nom. by Ethan Baptiste, Irene Bryson
9. Roger Hall, Nom. by Kenneth Bryson, Clayton Gabriel
Nomination Meeting at OIB Hall - Results:
Nominated for Chief:
1. Clarence Louie Nominated by Modesta Betterton, Celina Alex
2. Ethan Baptiste Nom. by Kenneth Bryson, Theresa Gabriel
Nominated for Councillor:
1. Charlotte Stringam Nom. by Leona Baptiste, Aleana Baptiste
2. Kathy Falkus, Nom. by Linda Anderson, Modesta Betterton
3. Anthony (Tony) Baptiste, Nom. by Modesta Betterton, Deborah Baptiste (Bouclair)
4. Helen Gallagher, Nom. by Leona Baptiste, Anthony (Tony) Baptiste
5. Charlene Baptiste, Nom. by Deborah Baptiste (Bouclair), Georgina Wright
6. Hubert George, Nom. by Ethan Baptiste, Moses Baptiste
7. Veronica McGinnis, Nom. by Ethan Baptiste, Cecilia George
8. Theresa Gabriel, Nom. by Ethan Baptiste, Irene Bryson
9. Roger Hall, Nom. by Kenneth Bryson, Clayton Gabriel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
